womac reliability and validity
Summarizing the included studies and preparing for synthesis: Step 2.1. The WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index and Lequesne Algofunctional Index have not been translated and validated for Iranian patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee or hip. Congratulations to my chairman Dr Vaughn Starnes 100th AATS…” Convergent and discriminant validity were examined by the correlation of the IADL Scale with the Barthel Index, SF-12, WOMAC short form, and QuickDASH questionnaires. Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, Netherlands See all articles by this author. The Timed Up and Go (TUG) test is a performance-based measure of functional mobility that was initially developed to identify mobility and balance impairments in older adults. Overview; Fingerprint; Abstract. (1999). View 0 peer reviews of Validity, reliability, and comparison of the WOMAC osteoarthritis index and Lequesne algofunctional index in Turkish patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis on Publons Download Web of Science⢠My Research Assistant : Bring the power of the Web of Science to your mobile device, wherever inspiration strikes. Reliability and Validity of the IKDC, KOOS, and WOMAC for Patients With Meniscal Injuries Show all authors. Missing items percentage of no-answer: Please review our privacy policy. Scand J Rheumatol 1999; 28:210-5 Scand J Rheumatol 1999; 28:210-5 Söderman P, Malchau H. Validity and reliability of Swedish WOMAC osteoarthritis index: a self-administered disease-specific questionnaire (WOMAC) versus generic instruments (SF-36 and NHP). Reliability, validity, and responsiveness in patients with arthroscopically assessed osteoarthritis. To assess validity and reliability of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) osteoarthritis (OA) index and Lequesne algofunctional index in Turkish patients with hip or knee OA and to compare the results of the instruments for these two particular sites of involvement. DOI: 10.15.19/JPT.0000000000000188 Methods. PVAS is a tool widely used to measure pain. "Reliability and validity of the international physical activity questionnaire in the Nord-Trondelag health study (HUNT) population of men" Find papers alphabetically by title. Methods A multicenter, randomized, doubleâblind, placeboâcontrolled, parallelâgroup study was conducted for validation of the electronic ⦠WOMAC is a standardized index for the assessment of the severity of osteoarthritis symptoms. Ann Rheum Dis 2004;63:226-32 «PMID: 14962953» PubMed Schiphof D, Boers M, Bierma-Zeinstra SM. Regarding content validity, Cronbach's α was 0.93 for 100 individuals with hip and knee OA. TTMETHODS: Data from 168 subjects with knee OA, who participated in a rehabilitation program, were used in the analyses. Objective: To evaluate the acceptability, reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Turkish version of Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) osteoarthritis (OA) index in physiotherapy outpatient practice in Turkey. Reliability was measured by evaluating internal consistency (Cronbach α) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient). Da seduto o in posizione supina the reliability and validity of the Italian version of WOMAC 5. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Lysholm knee score and Tegner activity scale for patients with meniscal injury of the knee. Validity. At protocol stage: Step 1.1. Stucki G, Sangha O, Stucki S, et al. The aim of this study was to determine the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the WOMAC, compared with SF-12 and EQ-5D in elderly who sustained a femoral neck fracture. 26 WOMAC consisted of subclasses 5 items for pain, 2 items for stiffness, and 17 items for physical functioning. Victor A. van de Graaf, MD * â Victor A. van de Graaf . 2006;88(4):698â705. 5) HF10838: McGrory BJ, Harris WH. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness in patients with arthroscopically assessed osteoarthritis. The intrarater reliability of KL grading has been established to be high. Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Regarding EFA, the following were obtained: Finally, the definitive version of question 1 was: OARSI evidence-based, expert consensus guidelines. Validity, reliability, and applicability of seven definitions of hip osteoarthritis used in epidemiological studies: a systematic appraisal. Reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. 16 Briggs KK, Kocher MS, Rodkey WG, Steadman JR. Western Ontario and ... 2. Western Ontario and MacMaster Universities. To validate the WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index for use in Sweden. WOMAC : Disease-Specific, to assess knee osteoarthritis outcomes. Ewa M. Roos, M Klässbo, L S Lohmander. , Dutmer et al. 10.1080/03009749950155562. Stucki G, Sangha O, Stucki S, et al. Spine. One study reported the inter-rater correlation as good to excellent (0.74–1.0) for the domain scores, as did a study by Kirmit et al. Ewa M. Roos, M Klässbo, L S Lohmander. It is based solely on the ability to perform activities of daily living (ADLs) and can be used for adults and children 10 years old or older. RESULTS: Results for the IKDC, KOOS dimensions, and WOMAC dimensions, respectively, were as follows: Cronbach alpha = .90, .72-.95, and .84-.95; ICC = 0.93, 0.84-0.89, and 0.77-0.89; SEM = 5.3, 7.0-12.6, and 7.3-12.2; SDD = 14.6, 19.4-35.0, and 20.2-33.9; hypotheses testing confirmation = 100%, 86%, and 85%. Patient prioritization refers to the process of ranking referrals in a certain order based on various criteria with the aim of improving fairness and equity in the delivery of care. The Version table provides details related to the release that this issue/RFE will be addressed. testâretest reliability and construct validity. Reliability and Validity of the IKDC, KOOS, and WOMAC for Patients With Meniscal Injuries Show all authors. WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index: Reliability, validity, and responsiveness in patients with arthroscopically assessed osteoarthritis. Test–retest reliability in 76 individuals with hip and knee OA, age ≥40 years, demonstrated an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.85 (95% confidence interval 0.76–0.91) . Resolved: Release in which this issue/RFE has been resolved. WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index: Reliability, validity, and responsiveness in patients with arthroscopically assessed osteoarthritis. WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index-Reliability, validity, and responsiveness in patients with arthroscpoically assessed osteoarthritis. Standardized response means were higher for the ALF (0.49) than for both the WOMAC (0.39) and the SF-36 (0.12). The Cronbach's alphas of the WOMAC and Lequesne subscales were ranged 0.78-0.95 and 0.51-0.85 for hip and 0.78-0.94 and 0.61-0.71 for knee OA, respectively. Summarize the characteristics of each study in a ‘Characteristics of included studies’ table (see Chapter 5), including examining the interventions to itemize their content and other characteristics (Section 9.3.1). 1999;24(13):1290-1294. To assess validity and reliability of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) osteoarthritis (OA) index and Lequesne algofunctional index in Turkish patients with hip or knee OA and to compare the results of the instruments for these ⦠INTRODUCTION Osteoarthritis of the knee is one of the most common type of arthritis and the major cause of chronic musculoskeletal pain and mobility disability in the elderly, resulting decreased functional activity. Research output: Contribution to journal ⺠Journal article ⺠Research ⺠peer-review. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically ⦠Cueetionario lower than 0. Rabea Begum ... WOMAC-Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, NDI- Neck Disability Index.
Crime Analysis Certificate Ucf, John Smith Apartment Man In The High Castle, Faze Megga World Cup Placement, South Caldwell High School Website, Persol Steve Mcqueen Po0714sm,
